Volumetric Performance of a Rotary Engine Explained rotary 13b engineTheoretical Volumetric Air Movement was calculated assuming that a 13B MSP rotary motor has equivalent displacement in 720º of crankshaft rotation as a 2.six Liter, four stroke aide motor. Recognize how VE climbs as Motor Speed boosts, till it reaches 5500rpms. This is were the motor is rated to generate peak torque, therefore its safe and sound to suppose that VE will peak at or close by 5500rpms. Furthermore, you can securely believe that Volumetric Effectiveness plotted towards engine speed will mimic the form and characteristics of the torque curve created by the engine.
Be aware that the plotted VE is fairly linear: starts @ eighty% and climbs its way to a tad around a hundred%. If this experiment's results could be validated and the parameters I utilised had been accurate, it would signify that the Renesis engine -on my automobile at least- is in truth quite successful for a usually aspirated internal combustion powerplant -VE definition over.
Calculating Volumetric Performance (VE) for the Renesis (13B MSP) rotary motor:We will use the following values obtained during our data log:
Info:
Consumption Air Temperature (IAT) = 82ºF
Motor Speed (RPM) = 8561rpm
AirFlow (MAF) = 27.3lb/minute
THEORETICAL AIRFLOW CALCULATION:Formula:
[(ED) x (rpm) x (VE)] / [(ES) x (C)] = TAF
Variables:
ED = Engine Displacement [in³]
rpm = Motor Velocity [RPMs]
VE = Volumetric Performance [%]
ES = Engine Stroke Coefficient [#]
Do = Conversion coefficient from in³ to ft³
TAF = Theoretical Air Circulation [ft³]
Solving:
[(159.64in³) x (8561rpm) x (1)] / [(2) x (1728 in³/ft³)] = TAF
TAF = 395.42ft³
Values:
ED = two.6 Liters (1308cc x 2) >> 159.64in³
rpm = I selected 8561rpm arbitrarily.
VE = Because this corresponds to Theoretical VE, we assume VE = a hundred% (1)
ES = Since we simplify a 13B engine to a 4 stroke piston engine -thus two.6L- we use a coefficient of two.
C = 1728in³/ft³
AIR DENSITY & TEMPERATURE CALCULATION:System:
[(t1) / (t2)] = [(d2) / (d1)]
Variables:
t1 = Temperature of air for a acknowledged density [ºR]
t2 = Temperature of the intake air measured by the IAT sensor [ºR]
d1 = Density of air for a acknowledged temperature [lb/ft³]
d2 = Density of the intake air [lb/ft³]
Fixing for [d2]:
[(t1) / (t2)] x (d1) = (d2)
[(491.67ºR) / (541.67ºR)] x (.0808lb/ft³) = d2
d2 = .073341lb/ft³
Values:
t1 = 32ºF >> 491.67ºR
t2 = 82ºF >> 541.67ºR
d1 = .0808lb/ft³
VOLUMETRIC Circulation Price CALCULATION:Formula:
[(MF) / (d2)] = AVF
Variables:
MF = Mass Flow fee taken from CANScan [lb/minute]
d2 = Density of the intake air [lb/ft³]
AVF = True Volumetric Flowrate [ft³/minute]
Fixing:
[(27.3lb/moment) / (.073341lb/ft³)] = AVF
AVF = 372.233ft³/moment
Values:
MF = 27.3lb/moment
d2 = .073341lb/ft³
VOLUMETRIC Performance CALCULATION:Formula:
[(AVF) / (TAF)] = VE
Variables:
AVF = True Volumetric Circulation fee [ft³/minute]
TAF = Theoretical Air Circulation charge [ft³/moment]
VE = Volumetric Efficiency [%]
Fixing:
[(372.233ft³/moment) / (395.42ft³/moment)] = AVF
AVF = .94 >> 94%
Values:
AVF = 372.233ft³/moment
TAF = 395.42ft³/minute
Is this remotely near to correct? I really don't know! I simply took the time to do a minor study by means of diverse channels & gathered data.